Showing posts with label Straight of Hormuz. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Straight of Hormuz. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 1, 2009

USS Hartford Cover Up...Chief Blanket The Staff of Rear Admiral Frank Thorp

It should come as no surprise to find out the Chief of The "USS Hartford Liars Den" in the Navy's attempts to cover up the truth is none other than Rear Adm. Frank Thorp, the Navy’s chief of misinformation. Attempts were made to reach out to him at 1(703)697-7391 (Main Number for his office)but he sees himself far too important of a Flag Officer to speak with a CIVILIAN sticking his nose where it does not belong, interfering with the Navy's already blown Operational Security around the Nuclear Fast Attack Submarine, USS Hartford's MONUMENTAL COLLISION with the SS New Orleans.

Let us start with this...one of Rear Admiral Thorps henchmen in the Navy's office of MISINFORMATION, one Lt. Shaun Robertson still has not ANSWERED our questions, though he did try to RE FRAME those questions in a morning phone call. More importantly, I asked Lt. Robertson to EMAIL the answers he did give me so that I could VERIFY the Navy's answers, and at an appropriate later date use them to impunge their character, and prove in a complaint to the Navy's IG that Rear Admiral Thorp and his staff when presented with STRAIGHT FORWARD QUESTIONS lie if it suits their purposes, even when the public has proof that REFUTES their CANNED Propaganda. Let us preserve the Nuclear Navy's SAFETY MYTH, hide radiation leaks at all costs...is that the name of the play there Mr. Thorp...yes, you are correct in assuming I afford your stripes NO RESPECT. Even the sin of DELIBERATE OMISSION makes you nothing more than a liar, the leader in the proverbial Den of Thieves.

The Navy's Submarine Group prides itself on its silence, is willing to go to great extremes to protect it...it is literally a part of the fabric of those who have spent time in the Silent Service. The Nuclear Navy takes the old naval adage "Lose Lips Sink Ships" to new and dangerous extremes. Do you think I and other bloggers are unaware of the Submarine Creed, the unwritten order that speaking about a mission or AN ACCIDENT is considered A BREECH OF OPERATIONAL SECURITY. Tell me Mr. Thorp how we get to the latent weaknesses that caused this accident? How can similar accidents be avoided if your dearly loved CODE OF SILENCE allows these latent weaknesses to go uncorrected. What happens when the next time occurs, and your Nuclear Navy is not as lucky as they were this time around?

We already know the CO is gone...he failed in JOB ONE, or at least makes a convenient SCAPEGOAT in appeasing those that must be appeased, such as Congress. What is JOB ONE? Avoid a Tier 1 EVENT...WHOOPS, failed that one now haven't we? (For those wondering, a Tier One event is a grounding, collision or death.)Someone pass that man a bottle and a shot glass. In a nuclear powered Submarine (or other military vessel)we as a nation and a world cannot AFFORD accident, cannot afford collisions as the cost in human lives lost in a serious incident are far to grave to even consider in this post. Simply stated, the entire crew of the USS Hartford should be summarily dismissed and processed for discharge...like it or not, a ships crew is a TEAM, and this is even more true on board a sub, and a team either succeeds or fails as a team...this team HAS FAILED. (ORSE scores aside.)

Let me give you an example of the Stupidity of your CODE OF SILENCE there Mr. Admiral Thorp. I live in New York, was in New York city the day the twin towers went down. Unlike Janet Napolitano, I am not willing to call Terrorist Attacks and those who plan/perpetrate them as "Human caused disasters." I want a secure America, want our border with Mexico closed, and those that are not supposed to be here (including Illegals Aliens) deported. I want DHS and our military doing their jobs, and using some commonsense...the Navy seems to often to IGNORE commonsense. I'll not share everything I have surmised about the USS Hartford incident, but instead will illustrate my point in a different fashion.

You hold an event in the Navy (in April) to celebrate the April 11 (I think 1900) purchase of a gas powered submarine, that event being if you will the BIRTH DATE of the modern American Submarine service. You can get information on various plans at various locations as each base holds its own separate events (one for enlisted men and one for officers) to celebrate the Birthday of American Submarines. Without even trying, I was able to identify 17 Bloggers that are married to members of the Navy blogging about this event, including the exact location of the Event at the Hilton Hotel.

Let me guess here Admiral Thorp...IT NEVER OCCURRED TO YOU or your staff to have Operational Security for these events...how many high ranking members of BASE COMMAND usually attend these events. (Having attended a few, and been in hotels while others were being held, I have a pretty good idea.) Have you or anyone else ever asked yourselves how easily one of these events could be COMPROMISED when information about the when and where of them is SO EASILY AVAILABLE ON THE WORLD WIDE WEB?...HELLO, 17 BLOGGERS, and I did not even break a sweat. Maybe it is just me, but if these wives of Officers need their online stitch and bitch sessions with each other, it MIGHT make good sense to give them a blogging area behind a firewall or two?

Your ability to keep speculation down among those that have retired from active service is NO BETTER. Have you or your staff really started LOOKING to findout out what all is actually out there on the net, including some very well written surmises from people in the know on the USS Hartford incident? Do you think I just pulled the Radiation Leak out of thin air? Here is an example of THE EASY STUFF:
Submarine Hartford Port Side Sail


This post will continue in another article where we can discuss for instance the Steel Plate issue, its adequacy or lack thereof on the USS New Orleans. A BUMP with a submarine left a gaping 16-18 foot hole in this ship, and spilled 25,000 gallons of fuel. I have some DESIGN CONCERNS here folks, and think they should have been caught and foreseen BEFORE THIS ACCIDENT. Obviously we have a thickness and strength question, but even more alarming...who SIGNED OFF ON THE FUEL TANK(s) BEING SO ACCESSIBLE to Enemy Attack? Think here a well aimed should aunched rocket could create a serious issue? Is that a part of this investigation, and will the up line officers guilty of this stupidity see their careers ENDED?

NEW ORLEANS, Nov. 8, 2002 (PRIMEZONE) -- Northrop Grumman Corporation (NYSE:NOC) and the U.S. Navy today commemorated the keel laying for USS New Orleans (LPD 18), the second of 12 ships in the Navy's San Antonio-class of amphibious transport dock ships being built by Northrop Grumman's Ship Systems sector. A photo accompanying this releases is available at: http://media.primezone.com/noc/ The ship was assigned the name New Orleans in recognition of Louisiana's largest city and to honor one of the world's major ports. LPD 18 is being built at the company's Avondale Operations in New Orleans.


Of course, if you do not want to have that CONVERSATION, maybe we could discuss what AMERICA's Nuclear Navy does not want US AND THE WORLD TO KNOW....(did I mention I love FISHING?)

Submarines routinely discharge radioactive waste into the ocean (Actually, I'm surprised that this guy doesn't know that). Technically, primary coolant isn't dangerously radioactive. Additionally, the reactor compartment is sealed with a locked vault door; piping leaks are not a problem, since the water would never reach the crew compartments.

The PRIMER for PART TWO

San Antonio was christened, by Texas Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison, during a ceremony at Northrop Grumman Ship Systems (NGSS) Avondale Operations in New Orleans. It is the first surface ship ever designed in "virtual reality,” using computer modeling to design most of the ship before any steel was ever cut. It is also the first to feature the Advanced Enclosed Mast/Sensor system that replaces conventional masts, protecting radar and communications antennas from weather and allowing their electronic signals to pass through. The San Antonio class will functionally replace more than 41 ships (LPD 4, LSD 36, LKA 113 and LST 1179 classes of amphibious ships) providing the Navy and Marine Corps with modern, sea-based platforms.

Northrop's new warship class deemed combat ready

Fri May 2, 2008 4:58pm EDT
By Jim Wolf

WASHINGTON, May 2 (Reuters) - The San Antonio, first in a new class of amphibious warships built by Northrop Grumman Corp (NOC.N), has been certified as fit for sustained combat service, the U.S. Navy said on Friday.

The Navy declared the San Antonio, or LPD 17 class, had reached "initial operating capability" 12 years after its funding began.

"We've had some challenges to overcome with LPD 17," Rear Adm. Charles Goddard, program executive officer for ships, said in a statement. "But reaching this milestone is a testament to the collaborative efforts between the Navy and shipbuilding industry."

In an effort to stabilize the U.S. shipbuilding industrial base, Northrop Grumman, prime contractor for the LPD 17 class, said on March 31 it had awarded a subcontract to General Dynamics Corp (GD.N) for work on the eighth ship in the class, the Arlington. Terms were not disclosed.

The San Antonio is on track to deploy with the Iwo Jima expeditionary strike group later this year after wrapping up its crew's training, the Naval Sea Systems Command said.

Two other ships of the class, New Orleans and Mesa Verde, have been commissioned and are undergoing training before moving toward integrated operations with their future strike groups.

John B. Skillman, Commanding Officer of the USS New Orleans
Lieutenant Roy Zaletski
SEAL BEACH – A floating fortress built for combat, the USS New Orleans LPD 18 has a menacing stature and peculiar design that demands attention and boasts some of the newest technology in the Navy.

The $1 billion ship and its crew are set for their maiden deployment in early 2009 – destination unknown, Davies said. (WE KNOW NOW.)

Commissioned: 2007

Length: 684 feet

Height: about 260 feet

Speed: 22 knots, about 24 mph

Crew: 361

Troops: 720

Source: The United States Navy

orleans ship davies navy seal beach port warship class uss weapons feet station officer war operations built stealthy radar ships massive served long set lpd naval puts board newest stands time crew early maiden amphibious cruiser enemy rare source san troops city missions public united commanding deployment design

TEMPORARY HOME: The USS New Orleans is docked at the Seal Beach Naval Weapons Station.

Pride Before The Fall...why are ACTIVE DUTY Military Letting the world know what ship they serve on Admiral Thorp? GOD, are you people REALLY THIS IGNORANT? Partial List of people who have identified they were or are stationed about the USS New Orleans...you can even sign up as a member of the site and have their EMAIL addresses...shaking head:

Newlove, Jarod

Palma, Jeff

Young, Christopher

King, Cory

Janzen, Douglas

Sparks, Glenn, Sparky

Falcone, Joey

Biggs, Edward

Knox, Ariel

Ratliff, Chanelle

Flores, Rober

Williams, Lashawn

Chapman, David

Sandi, Edward

Schoenberg, Kimberly

Martin, Will

Scott, Steven

Smith, Shannon

Davidson, Bob

Denley, Blake

Cherry, Cario

Scott, John Scrappy NEW

Wells, George

Sutton, Jeffrey

Zorich, William

Diesch, Alicia

Collins, Crystal Collins

Cloonan, Nathan

Smith, William

Onquit, Patricio

Urbano, Daniel

Szloboda, Naomi

Lawrence, Shane

Sanders, Antonio

Torres, James(booger)

Parish, John NEW

Hunter, Daniel

Jones, Namir (Na)

Howley, Ashley NEW "Good crew, broke ship"

By the way, how easy does the NAVY want to make it for people looking to coop a member of the military to find them...as example, this link in Navy Times http://www.navytimes.com/projects/careers/navy/petty_officers/e4/dc3_gse3/

Found by the way doing a Google Search of Ashley Howley above.

CAREER ENDED? TIME WILL TELL....


Monday, March 23, 2009

USS Hartford Nuclear Sub No Longer Seaworthy? Some Seem To Think So...

If you really start doing some snooping around on the web, some are suggesting that the USS Hartford is no longer SEAWORTHY, the its BENT SAIL, the broken welds and other damage have said sub ready for CUT UP and disposal! Those rumors beg the question...can we RISK the lives of the USS Hartford crew trying to LIMP SAID SUB back here to America on the open seas? Can we risk the damage to the world environment if the submarine gets into more troubles in the middle of the open ocean?What would be the cost to the environment, to mankind if (God Forbid) this submarine tried to limp back to America and ended up SINKING to the bottom of the ocean floor? Is the risk worth it, or should we TOW THE SUB BACK?

USS Hartford No Longer Sea Worthy? Formal Request For OPEN INVESTIGATION

Naval Inspector General

Attn: Navy Hotline

Building 172

1254 Ninth Street, S.E.

Washington Navy Yard DC

Take Notice of the nice SMOOTH SEALED surface where the Sail joins the Hull.

Notice the vertical/horizontal alignments...compare this to the new CANT.

Dear Inspector General:
As an Anti-Nuclear environmentalist, I have grave concerns when it comes to all things surrounding the Military/Commercial Nuclear Industry...simply stated, there is more than adequate reason not to trust anything put out in the way of Propaganda from the Nuclear Industry (through NEI) or our government through various and assorted agencies (DOD, DOE, NRC, and yes, the US Nuclear Navy).

It does not take a rocket scientist to realize the horrific collision of the USS Hartford with the USS New Orleans was/is far more serious than the Navy is letting on. The few available pictures of the USS Hartford fast attack submarine show SERIOUSLY broken welds around the sail. The Conning Tower is canted from stem to stern, suggesting that periscopes are no longer working.

Further, it is my own belief and allegation that such a significant collision has impinged upon the reactor cores cooling capabilities. It is my belief that any attempts to navigate the USS Hartford back to America under its own power endanger the crew of the USS Hartford, as well as the citizens of the world, and our environment.

It is therefore respectfully requested that your office open up a FULLY PUBLIC investigation of how the accident occurred, and just what damage has been done to both vessels. This investigation should include inspection of the entire nuclear propulsion/cooling system to assure the safety of the world population. Said inspection should take place after the nuclear submarine has been returned back to America using the same technology used to transport the USS Cole. (see photograph)

World public health, the safety of the grew, and the protection of our world oceans should supercede whatever Middle East Agenda the USS Hartford was carrying out. When already we are hearing rumors of water tight doors below deck being incapable of closing, the Navy cannot and must not needlessly risk lives of our American Sailors.

Respectfully,
United States Citizen
Anti Nuclear Activist


PS,,,what environmental restoration work is underway for the TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND GALLONS OF SPILLED DIESEL, and what took the Superior Officers so long in getting a grew out to deal with that end of this accident.

Vice Admiral William E. Gortney
Rear Admiral Thomas A. Cropper
Rear Admiral Scott E. Sanders
Rear Admiral Scott E. Sanders




Sunday, March 22, 2009

United States Nuclear Navy HIDING SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE from Nuclear Sub/Ship Accident in Straight of Hormuz

A cursory Google Search, and a check of the Fifth Fleets Bahrain Web Site makes it abundantly clear that the Navy and its Nuclear Submarine people are DESPARATELY trying to keep the world from knowing just how much damage was done to the USS New Orleans and the Submarine, the USS Hartford. Two pictures (supposedly the USS New Orleans) are very obvious PROPAGANDA PIECES meant to present a BUSINESS AS USUAL, nothing is wrong appearance to the citizens of America. Oddly, the Fifth Fleet released NO PICTURES of the USS Hartford Fast Attack Nuclear Sub docking, or coming into port. It is this author's belief that the submarine's mast has suffered SIGNIFICANT damage. In other news...the old no harm no foul, we saw no DIESEL FUEL excuse has also been trotted out...that's right Commander Propaganda, 25,000 gallons of diesel just VANISHED! Where does a citizen file a complaint at? Do not believe that NUCLEAR REACTOR was not damaged until Congress conducts a FULL AND COMPLETE INDEPENDENT investigation...if the USS Hartford was NOT SIGNIFICANTLY DAMAGED, where are the photographs?

Well Well Well...HIDDEN on a MARINE website, a picture of the DAMAGE, or at least a TARP (as in Wall Street) covering the NAVAL NUCLEAR MISTAKE!

Hartford suffered “visible” damage to the sail and to a bow plane. Campbell could not say if components of the sail such as masts and periscopes are damaged.

“It’s important to point out that Hartford’s [nuclear] power plant was not affected in this at all,” she said. “We’ll be doing a full incident investigation report as well as a [Judge Advocate General’s Manual] investigation.” No DAMAGE, LET IAEA do independent verification. How about Union of Concerned Scientist? Mother's For Peace? By the way, isn't this the THIRD SUCH COLLISION RECENTLY? Yet no ADMIRALS have tenured their resignations out of SHAME?

This is third recent collision involving a U.S. submarine in the Strait of Hormuz or the Persian Gulf.


March 21, 2009

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Release #049-09

USS Hartford and USS New Orleans Arrive In Port Bahrain

MANAMA, Bahrain – The U.S. Navy submarine and U.S. amphibious ship that collided in the Strait of Hormuz March 20, arrived in port Bahrain today.

USS Hartford (SSN 768) and USS New Orleans (LPD 18) arrived at Mina Salman pier to further assess and evaluate the damage that resulted from their collision at sea.

The incident remains under investigation.

Overall damage to both ships is being evaluated. The propulsion plant of the submarine was unaffected by this collision. New Orleans suffered a ruptured fuel tank, which resulted in a fuel spill of approximately 25,000 gallons of diesel fuel marine in the Strait of Hormuz.

Aerial searches of the area where the fuel spill occurred were conducted yesterday, and revealed no indication of any remaining fuel on the ocean’s surface.

The U.S. 5th Fleet has been working in coordination with the Navy Oceanographic Office to determine refined search areas, based on currents and winds. Additional searches were flown by U.S. Navy aircraft today and found no remaining fuel on the surface.

The quick dissipation of the fuel is likely due to the type of fuel, and various environmental factors to include air and water temperatures, winds and seas.

Both Hartford and New Orleans are currently on regularly scheduled deployments to the U.S. 5th Fleet area of operations conducting Maritime Security Operations (MSO).

MSO set the conditions for security and stability in the maritime environment as well as complement the counter-terrorism and security efforts of regional nations. MSO deny international terrorists use of the maritime environment as a venue for attack or to transport personnel, weapons, or other material.

090321-N-8053S-130 BAHRAIN (March 21, 2009) USS New Orleans (LPD 18) pulls into Mina Salman pier in Bahrain to asses and evaluate damage that resulted from a collision with the submarine, USS Hartford (SSN 768) in the Strait of Hormuz. No personnel aboard New Orleans were injured in the incident. Overall damage to both ships is being evaluated. New Orleans is deployed to the U.S. 5th fleet area of operations to support Maritime Security Operations. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class David K. Simmons / Released) USS New Orleans Arrives in Bahrain

090321-N-8053S-130 BAHRAIN (March 21, 2009) USS New Orleans (LPD 18) pulls into Mina Salman pier in Bahrain to asses and evaluate damage that resulted from a collision with the submarine, USS Hartford (SSN 768) in the Strait of Hormuz. No personnel aboard New Orleans were injured in the incident. Overall damage to both ships is being evaluated. New Orleans is deployed to the U.S. 5th fleet area of operations to support Maritime Security Operations. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class David K. Simmons / Released)

090321-N-8053S-165 BAHRAIN (March 21, 2009) USS New Orleans (LPD 18) lowers the ships’ brow after mooring pierside in Bahrain where U.S. Navy engineers and inspection teams will asses and evaluate damage that resulted from a collision with the amphibious ship, USS Hartford (SSN 768) in the Strait of Hormuz. No personnel aboard New Orleans were injured in the incident. Overall damage to both ships is being evaluated. New Orleans is deployed to the U.S. 5th fleet area of operations to support Maritime Security Operations. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class David K. Simmons / Released)

090321-N-8053S-165 BAHRAIN (March 21, 2009) USS New Orleans (LPD 18) lowers the ships’ brow after mooring pierside in Bahrain where U.S. Navy engineers and inspection teams will asses and evaluate damage that resulted from a collision with the amphibious ship, USS Hartford (SSN 768) in the Strait of Hormuz. No personnel aboard New Orleans were injured in the incident. Overall damage to both ships is being evaluated. New Orleans is deployed to the U.S. 5th fleet area of operations to support Maritime Security Operations. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class David K. Simmons / Released)

http://www.cusnc.navy.mil/photos/hi/090321-N-8053S-165.jpg

THE TENSION: USS Hartford and USS New Orleans Arrive in Port...

Mar 21, 2009 ... BAHRAIN (March 21, 2009) USS New Orleans (LPD 18) pulls into Mina Salman pier in Bahrain where U.S. Navy engineers and inspection teams will ...

thetension.blogspot.com/2009/03/uss-hartford-... - 8 hours ago

https://oceanography.navy.mil/legacy/web/RAWS/pier.htm

Friday, March 20, 2009

Did Nuclear Sub USS Hartford ALMOST SINK USS New Orleans in Overnight Collision in Straight of Hormuz?

It is obvious that the United States Navy is calling in favors in trying to keep news tamped down where the over night near cataclysmic Nuclear Submarine accident almost sank the USS New Orleans in the Straight of Hormuz, only the busiest shipping lane in the entire world...what news getting out is alarming. The USS New Orleans has its Hull viciously ripped open, ballast tanks, tore open a fuel storage tank dumping over 25,000 gallons of diesel into the Straight of Hormuz as ship crews went into Emergency Red Alert efforts to save the stricken vessel from sinking...after much effort, the ship was stabilized and saved. Meanwhile, the USS Hartford Nuclear Attack Sub has over ten percent of its crew reporting injuries, and a Navy Spokesperson has admitted CLEARLY VISIBLE DAMAGE...IE, the MAST was almost RIPPED OFF.

Friday, March 20, 2009

How Close To Sinking Did USS New Orleans Come In Vicious Collision With Nuclear Submarine?

How close did the USS New Orleans comes to sinking overnight when it had major sections of the ship RIPPED OPEN AND FLOODED in its vicious collision with the nuclear submarine USS Hartford? With each passing hour the Navy DAMAGE ASSESSMENTS are growing...what had been at first classified as a minor incident now has the USS Hartford unable to submerge, and tells a story of the USS New Orleans having to implement EMERGENCY ACTIONS to stabilize the ship after two ballast tanks were severely ruptured, temporarily crippling the ship. Both vessels are now limping to a SECRET LOCATION for repairs as the Navy begins damage control of COVER UP. It is known that the Hartford shows SIGNIFICANT AND VISIBLE DAMAGE to its mast...could a much harder collision have ripped said mast off, causing instant death, and the sinking of a nuclear submarine in the busiest shipping lane in the world?

Sub, amphib collide in Hormuz Strait; 15 hurt

http://www.navytimes.com/news/2009/03/navy_collision_033009/
By Andrew Scutro - Staff writer
Posted : Friday Mar 20, 2009 11:50:58 EDT
NAVY

Two U.S. warships are out of action in the Middle East after the attack submarine Hartford and the amphibious transport dock New Orleans collided in calm seas while transiting the Strait of Hormuz into the Persian Gulf in the early morning hours Friday.

Fifteen sailors on Hartford were injured but were able to return to duty, according to Navy officials. No injuries were reported aboard New Orleans.

The exact circumstances of the 1 a.m. incident are unclear. The Hartford was “submerged but near the surface” at the time of the collision, a source told Navy Times.

Both ships are now limping into a local undisclosed port, said Cmdr. Jane Campbell, spokeswoman at 5th Fleet in Bahrain.

“They’re both underway on their own power, and both are in the [Persian] Gulf at this point,” she said. “Hartford is on the surface and will remain on the surface until she’s in port.”

Damage to the wounded ships is being evaluated.

Campbell said initial assessments show two ballast tanks on New Orleans were ruptured, resulting in seawater flooding that required the ship to be stabilized. A fuel tank was also ruptured, causing an estimated spill of 25,000 gallons of marine diesel fuel into the gulf.

“She had flooding in three distinct compartments,” Campbell said. “The flooding is secure, and the ship is making way on her own power.”

Hartford suffered “visible” damage to the sail and to a bow plane. Campbell could not say if components of the sail such as masts and periscopes are damaged as well, but the sub will make a surface transit into port.

“It’s important to point out that Hartford’s [nuclear] powerplant was not affected in this at all,” she said. “We’ll be doing a full incident investigation report as well as a JAGMAN investigation.”

This is the third recent collision involving a U.S. submarine in the Strait of Hormuz or the Persian Gulf.

On Jan., 8, 2007, the attack submarine Newport News and the Japanese oil tanker Mogamigawa collided in the Strait of Hormuz, a busy strategic chokepoint that runs between Iran and Oman. Both ships were headed south and out of the gulf at night when the submerged submarine was overtaken by the faster-moving tanker sailing on the same route.

The movement of the large tanker caused the smaller submarine to be drawn into the ship’s surface wake by the intermingling pressure areas created by their hull washes — a phenomenon known in physics as the “Venturi effect.”

In a previous incident, on the night of Sept. 25, 2005, the attack submarine Philadelphia, while traveling on the surface, collided with a Turkish cargo ship off the coast of Bahrain. No one was injured in the collision.

Both Philadelphia and Newport News underwent repairs in Bahrain before returning to homeport.

Hartford and New Orleans are members of the Boxer Expeditionary Strike Group. Another ship from the group, the dock landing ship Comstock, was in the area at the time of the collision. Boxer remains in the Gulf of Aden on counterpiracy patrol. It and most of the other strike group departed San Diego Jan. 8.